Need alittle help guys

The main Page for the Hodaka Club Discussion Group
User avatar
RichardMott
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 12:36 am
Location: King of Prussia, Pa

Re: Need alittle help guys

Post by RichardMott »

Ok,

I was wrong about the torque. :oops: But here is the page photo from the Clymer Hodaka manual showing torques and capacities for the 100 MX Super Rat.
Click on it to see and increase size to better view. :ugeek:
Attachments
Super Rat info
Super Rat info
Rick Mott

In order to be old and wise, you must survive young and stupid!
Zyx
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:41 pm

Re: Need alittle help guys

Post by Zyx »

Using only generic values for M7 bolts, torque can go from 102 to as high as 132 inch-pounds. Just as Harry suggested using higher values on the Super Combat and similar engines, I can see using the same approach on the 100cc series -- IF -- using the book value does not successfully stop head gasket weepage. On my Webco conversion 93 engine, I have always used the book value, 105 inch pounds, without issues but would note that I was using a beam wrench, which can gives erratic results and at best, estimated values. Depends on degree of pilot error. I would say I was getting values plus or minus 5 pounds, so maybe I was getting a bit more than 105.

For my model 97, I started with 170 inch pounds as stated in the specs, and could not stop blow-by at the gasket. Raising the value to 240 inch pounds stopped the problem. 240 inch pounds is a value that is at the top end of generic torque values for a graded M8 bolt.

For the model 93A, assuming a flat and true mating surface and clean, lubed stud threads, and a new gasket, if the book value doesn't seal the head, try raising the torque five to ten pounds at a time until it doesn't leak, stopping at 132. If it doesn't seal at that value, something else is wrong.
viclioce
Posts: 4812
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:35 pm
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Contact:

Re: Need alittle help guys

Post by viclioce »

I have a Model 93 carb on my bike. Should be the same as yours. I found it very sticky because the PO let the bike sit for 5 years! I had to clean both the slide and its cylinder with some carb cleaner and 2000 grit sand paper I kept wet with carb cleaner. It worked well and the slide moves smoothly now! 2000 grit will polish it smooth! ; D Victor

1978 175SL
1976 03 Wombat
1975 99 Road Toad (2)
1973 96 Dirt Squirt (2)
1973 “Wombat Combat”
1973 Combat Wombat
1972 94 Wombat (2)
1972 Super Squirt
1971 92B+ Ace
1970 92B Ace 100B (2)
1968 92 Ace 100
1966 Ace 90
; D Victor
taber hodaka
Posts: 2229
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 6:34 pm

Re: Need alittle help guys

Post by taber hodaka »

When you torque the 100cc I would stay with the hodaka manuals torque specifications 105. If the head gasket doesn't seal, lap the head using fine sandpaper laid on glass. The bolt will take more torque the engine cases will not. The ace 90, ace 100 and the super rat all specified 105 inch pounds. I would not convert 132 inch pounds to foot pounds and try it on the small head bolts.-----Clarence
Zyx
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 4:41 pm

Re: Need alittle help guys

Post by Zyx »

Clarence,

I agree that the cases may not like higher torque with slim bolts, but am confused about the converting inch pounds to foot pounds warning. Twelve inch pounds is one foot pound. Math doesn't lie, so what is the warning about?
User avatar
Bullfrog
Posts: 2754
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 4:05 pm
Location: Oregon, 12 miles from the center of the Hodaka Universe(Athena)

Re: Need alittle help guys

Post by Bullfrog »

:?: Yeah (what Arizona said) Simple math conversion, what's the problem?

Ed
Keep the rubber side down!
User avatar
hodakamax
Posts: 2211
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:56 am
Location: Parsons Kansas

Re: Need alittle help guys

Post by hodakamax »

I think what Clarence is talking about is that some torque wrenches (particularly our ancient ones) are not as accurate at the extreme ends of the scale. Pulling 105 in/lbs on a 150 foot/pounds wrench (8.75 ft/lbs) is not much movement and in the under 10% area of the scale not even counting the difficulty of reading the scale.

If you have the latest digital read-out scale you might be close enough (just because it's digital doesn't mean it's accurate at the extreme ends of the scale) but I prefer using the proper scale for the job. (Even though it's ancient) :lol:

Max
Attachments
DSCN0982.JPG
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest